MST #175
MST #175
Conversation
WalkthroughA new documentation file for the Minimum Spanning Forest (MSF) algorithm has been added. It details the algorithm's purpose, usage, configuration options, and output. The documentation includes a usage example, a sample graph, and visual aids to illustrate the algorithm's application and results. Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
algorithms/mst.md (5)
38-40: Fix typo and capitalize sentence inweightAttributerow
attributeis misspelled and the sentence should start with an uppercase letter.-| `weightAttribute` | string | Unweighted | the atrribute to use as the tree weight. | +| `weightAttribute` | string | Unweighted | The attribute to use as the tree weight. |
44-46: Correct acronym from “MSF” to “MST”
The table describes the Minimum Spanning Tree; “MSF” is a typo.-| `edge` | Edge | An edge entity which is part of the MSF graph | +| `edge` | Edge | An edge entity which is part of the MST graph |
49-49: Remove trailing colon in heading
Markdown-lint (MD026) flags trailing punctuation.-## Examples: +## Examples
79-79: Remove trailing colon in sub-heading
SameMD026warning as above.-### Example: Find cheapest road network: +### Example: Find cheapest road network
84-92: Add blank lines around results table
MD058requires a blank line before and after tables.-#### Expected Results -| Edge | weight | -|-----------|--------| -| `[:ROAD]` | 0.7 | -| `[:TRAM]` | 1.2 | -| `[:TRAM]` | 1.5 | -| `[:ROAD]` | 2.2 | -| `[:ROAD]` | 2.3 | -| `[:ROAD]` | 3.0 | +#### Expected Results + +| Edge | weight | +|-----------|--------| +| `[:ROAD]` | 0.7 | +| `[:TRAM]` | 1.2 | +| `[:TRAM]` | 1.5 | +| `[:ROAD]` | 2.2 | +| `[:ROAD]` | 2.3 | +| `[:ROAD]` | 3.0 | +
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
images/city_plan.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
algorithms/mst.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
algorithms/mst.md
49-49: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
85-85: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD058, blanks-around-tables)
🪛 GitHub Actions: spellcheck
algorithms/mst.md
[error] 1-1: Spelling errors detected: 'subgraph', 'atrribute', 'MSF'. Please correct the spelling mistakes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
algorithms/mst.md (6)
49-49: Remove trailing colon from the headingMarkdown-lint (MD026) flags punctuation at the end of a heading.
Suggested tweak:-## Examples: +## Examples
79-79: Same MD026 issue for this sub-heading-### Example: Find cheapest road network: +### Example – Find cheapest road network
84-85: Add a blank line before the tableMarkdown-lint (MD058) requires tables to be surrounded by blank lines to render properly.
-#### Expected Results -| Edge | weight | +#### Expected Results + +| Edge | weight |
51-51: Apostrophe missing in “Let’s”-Lets take this City as an example: +Let's take this City as an example:
20-21: Clarify wording – use “minimum-weight edges”“Minimum edges” could be misread as “fewest edges”. Re-phrase for precision.
-MST first assigns each node to its own component. It iteratively scans for the minimum edges linking nodes across different components +MST first assigns each node to its own component. It iteratively scans for the minimum-weight edges linking nodes across different components
22-22: Minor verb agreement-If no attribute is given, returns any spanning tree. +If no attribute is given, the procedure returns an arbitrary spanning tree.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
algorithms/mst.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
algorithms/mst.md
49-49: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
79-79: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
85-85: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines
(MD058, blanks-around-tables)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
algorithms/mst.md (4)
1-5: Front-matter duplication & missing SEO keywords
titleanddescriptionrepeat the same text, which dings search-ranking and looks sloppy. Consider adding a concise, keyword-rich sentence todescriptioninstead of mirroring the title.-title: "Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)" -description: "Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)" +title: "Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)" +description: "Finds the least-cost (or greatest-cost) spanning sub-graph across weakly connected components."
32-40: Table default forweightAttributeis unclear
“Unweighted” isn’t a real default value. Say None or leave empty so users know they can omit it.
52-74: Minor Cypher style nits in sample graph
Comma-terminated last line beforeRETURN *, and skippingrEin the edge sequence look untidy and distract readers. Consider:
- Drop the trailing comma after the final edge.
- Rename
rF→rEfor consistent sequencing.
76-76: Remove trailing colon to silence markdownlint (MD026)
Headings shouldn’t end with punctuation.-## Examples: +## Examples
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
images/city_mst.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngimages/city_plan.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
algorithms/mst.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
algorithms/mst.md
[grammar] ~89-~89: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...## Expected Results The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their we...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
algorithms/mst.md
76-76: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
88-88: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
🪛 GitHub Actions: spellcheck
algorithms/mst.md
[error] 1-1: Spelling errors detected: 'subgraph', 'yeild'. Please correct the spelling mistakes.
algorithms/mst.md
Outdated
| #### Expected Results | ||
| The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their weights: | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Heading level jump & spelling error break CI
#### Expected Resultsskips a level (MD001).- “yeild” → “yield” fails the spell-checker.
-#### Expected Results
-The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their weights:
+### Expected Results
+The algorithm would yield the following edge objects and their weights:📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| #### Expected Results | |
| The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their weights: | |
| ### Expected Results | |
| The algorithm would yield the following edge objects and their weights: |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~89-~89: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...## Expected Results The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their we...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
88-88: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In algorithms/mst.md around lines 88 to 90, fix the heading level by changing
the heading from #### to ### or another appropriate level to avoid skipping
levels, and correct the spelling mistake by replacing "yeild" with "yield" to
pass the spell-checker.
algorithms/mst.md
Outdated
| MST first assigns each node to its own component. It iteratively scans for the minimum edges linking nodes across different components and merges them, ignoring the direction of edges throughout the process. The algorithm terminates when no further merges occur, producing a collection of trees. | ||
|
|
||
| The procedure finds a minimum or maximum weight spanning tree based on the specified `objective` and optimizes for the given `weightAttribute`. If no attribute is given, MST returns any collection of spanning trees. If any specified edges do not have the given weight attribute, or the value of the attribute is non-numeric, then they are treated as if they had infinite weight. Such an edge would only be included in the minimum spanning tree if no other edges with a valid weight attribute bridge the components it connects. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Infinite-weight rule is ambiguous for objective: "maximize"
Treating missing / non-numeric weights as “infinite” works for minimisation, but for maximisation you actually want them to behave as negative infinity so they never get selected. Spell this out (or state that they are excluded) to avoid user confusion & silent logic bugs.
-If any specified edges do not have the given weight attribute, or the value of the attribute is non-numeric, then they are treated as if they had infinite weight.
+If an edge lacks the attribute or the value is non-numeric, it is treated as:
+* `+∞` when `objective = "minimize"`
+* `−∞` (effectively excluded) when `objective = "maximize"`.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| MST first assigns each node to its own component. It iteratively scans for the minimum edges linking nodes across different components and merges them, ignoring the direction of edges throughout the process. The algorithm terminates when no further merges occur, producing a collection of trees. | |
| The procedure finds a minimum or maximum weight spanning tree based on the specified `objective` and optimizes for the given `weightAttribute`. If no attribute is given, MST returns any collection of spanning trees. If any specified edges do not have the given weight attribute, or the value of the attribute is non-numeric, then they are treated as if they had infinite weight. Such an edge would only be included in the minimum spanning tree if no other edges with a valid weight attribute bridge the components it connects. | |
| The procedure finds a minimum or maximum weight spanning tree based on the specified `objective` and optimizes for the given `weightAttribute`. If no attribute is given, MST returns any collection of spanning trees. | |
| If an edge lacks the attribute or the value is non-numeric, it is treated as: | |
| * `+∞` when `objective = "minimize"` | |
| * `−∞` (effectively excluded) when `objective = "maximize"`. | |
| Such an edge would only be included in the minimum spanning tree if no other edges with a valid weight attribute bridge the components it connects. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In algorithms/mst.md around lines 20 to 23, clarify the handling of missing or
non-numeric weight attributes for the "maximize" objective. Update the text to
specify that for maximization, such edges should be treated as having negative
infinity weight or be excluded entirely, ensuring they are never selected. This
will prevent ambiguity and potential logic errors when maximizing the spanning
tree weight.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
algorithms/msf.md (4)
76-76: Remove trailing colon in heading for Markdown-lint complianceHeading
## Examples:ends with a colon, triggering MD026. Drop the colon to silence the linter and keep style consistent with other docs.-## Examples: +## Examples
88-88: Fix heading level jump (####→###)
#### Expected Resultsskips a level after## Examples. Use###to increment by one, satisfying MD001.-#### Expected Results +### Expected Results
89-89: Correct typo “yeild” → “yield”Simple spelling error in prose.
-The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their weights: +The algorithm would yield the following edge objects and their weights:
55-74: Clarify relationship direction vs. algorithm semanticsThe Cypher sample creates directed
ROAD/TRAMrelationships (-->). Because MSF treats edges as undirected, it may confuse readers why directions are specified. Consider adding a sentence before or after the block to clarify that the procedure ignores direction, or switch to-[:ROAD]-style.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
images/city_msf.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
algorithms/msf.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
algorithms/msf.md
[grammar] ~89-~89: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...## Expected Results The algorithm would yeild the following edge objects and their we...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
algorithms/msf.md
76-76: Trailing punctuation in heading
Punctuation: ':'
(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
88-88: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h3; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
algorithms/msf.md (2)
82-83: Verify image paths
../images/city_plan.pngand../images/city_msf.pngmay break if the docs site’s build moves the Markdown file. Confirm the relative path is valid in the final site hierarchy or use an absolute docs-relative path.
1-90: Overall: solid, well-structured docContent reads clearly, parameters & returns are explicit, and examples are practical. With the minor polish above, it’s good to merge.
Summary by CodeRabbit